National Human Rights Institutions can be powerful vehicles for the promotion of human rights. This Featured Online Dialogue will focus on ways in which these mechanisms have utilized their mandates and resources to address issues of discrimination. New Tactics is pleased to host these experienced resource practitioners from eight countries (more biographical information). We invite you to join our featured resource practitioners to share your own experiences of engaging with your own National Human Rights Institution.
[Photo found on the City of Salem website.]
Table of Contents
The following table of contents was developed to make the dialogue easier to navigate. Important themes and different discussions have been highlighted for archival purposes and for new users. The preferred method of viewing the comments is with "Thread list - expanded" option, which is explained here.
Resources mentioned in the Dialogue can be found here.
Topics
- Human Rights Compliance Assessment Tool
- Engaging Civil Society and here
- Methods of Combating and Preventing Discrimination and here
- Mechanisms Available to Citizens and Organizations
- National Courts vs NHRIs
- Key Challenges and Success and here
- NGO Partnerships
- Issue of Discrimination and Institutions Mandates and here
- Key Discrimination Issues and Areas
- HIV/AIDS Discrimination
- Selection Procedure for Human Rights Institutions and here
- Using NHRI mechanisms for Addressing Discrimination Issues


Mechanisms, legislation and the UPRM
Christine Jesseman, Senior Researcher/Coordinator: Human Rights and Business Special Programme
South African Human Rights Copmmission
In addition to the right to equality entrenched in the Bill of Rights of our Constitution, national legislation has also been enacted. This includes the Employment Equity Act and the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act, commonly known as PEPUDA or the Equality Act. These Acts recognise our unfair past and aim to change the present inequalities and build a society wherein everyone is treated equally. The main objectives of PEPUDA are:
As stated in our recent submission at the Universal Periodic Review Mechanism of the UN Human Rights Council: “South Africa deserves substantial praise for its creation of the Equality Courts. These courts hear complaints relating to discrimination and are designed to be accessible to the average South African acting without a lawyer. Unfortunately, whilst great strides have been taken on the legislative front and Equality Courts have been set up, it is now becoming apparent that these courts are grossly underutilized and that some appear even to have been closed without notice to the Commission or to the general population. The SAHRC calls on the South African government to commit to taking further measures to popularize these courts and ensuring that discrimination is redressed.” The SAHRC monitors the Equality Courts.
A further mechanism available is the lodging of complaints by individuals etc directly with the SAHRC’s Legal Services Department. The SAHRC is also proactive though and can initiate a complaint and investigation in its own right and the process is therefore not only complaints driven.
Finally, another point raised at the UPRM was that: “Most disappointing, in light of South Africa’s history, it is substantially delayed in the completion of its reporting requirements under the Convention for the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD). Thus, the SAHRC calls on the South African government to commit to putting procedures in place to ensure that reports are submitted in a timely manner.”
Christine Jesseman, Head of Programme: Research, Documentation and Policy Analysis. South Africa Africacn Human Rights Commission